The American justice system is supposed to uphold fairness and transparency, ensuring that every individual receives due process. However, the case of real estate broker Anthony Viola reveals a troubling deviation from these principles, with allegations of prosecutorial misconduct, witness intimidation, and a suspicious death that continues to raise questions.

The Wrongful Indictment of Tony Viola

Tony Viola, a Cleveland-based real estate broker, found himself entangled in a nightmare of legal battles due to an erroneous indictment on mortgage fraud charges. The case against him, prosecuted in both federal and state courts, hinged on evidence that was later revealed to be misrepresented or improperly withheld.

Two key figures in the prosecution, Assistant Ohio Attorney General Dan Kasaris and Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Bennett, played significant roles in leading the charge against Viola. Their handling of the case has been the subject of much scrutiny, as reports suggest they engaged in unethical and potentially illegal activities to secure a conviction.

The Role of Dawn Pasela

Dawn Pasela, an Office Manager for the multi-jurisdictional Mortgage Fraud Task Force, became an unwilling participant in the prosecution’s questionable tactics. Reports indicate that Kasaris instructed Pasela to deceive Viola by posing as a graduate student and recording confidential conversations. Even more disturbingly, she was allegedly directed to contribute funds toward Viola’s legal fees as part of an investigative ploy.

Pasela, privy to the inner workings of the prosecution, later grew uneasy with the legal irregularities she witnessed. She became aware that exculpatory evidence—evidence that could have aided Viola’s defense—was being intentionally withheld by prosecutors. Her conscience seemingly compelled her to act, and she prepared to testify in Viola’s defense, aiming to expose the misconduct she had encountered.

A Suspicious Death Before Testimony

Tragically, just before she could take the stand, Dawn Pasela was found dead in her apartment under suspicious circumstances. Given the timing and her knowledge of the case, her death raised serious concerns about foul play. To date, no conclusive investigation has satisfactorily addressed the inconsistencies surrounding her passing, and many believe that the official explanation fails to account for the deeper implications of her untimely demise.

Interference and Intimidation

Beyond Pasela’s tragic fate, further allegations indicate that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) tracked investigative expenses and actively took measures against potential defense witnesses in Viola’s case. This raises grave concerns about whether governmental agencies conspired to suppress evidence and prevent the truth from coming to light.

If true, such actions would represent a severe miscarriage of justice, demonstrating that powerful actors within the legal system used their authority to manipulate outcomes and silence those who stood in their way.

A Call for Justice and Official Response

The circumstances surrounding Tony Viola’s prosecution and Dawn Pasela’s death cannot be ignored. A renewed and impartial investigation into these events is imperative to restore faith in the legal system.

To this end, a formal request was submitted to the Parma City Law Director’s Office and Prosecutor’s Office, urging them to launch a full-scale investigation into Pasela’s death and the prosecutorial misconduct in Viola’s case. Additionally, the Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI) of the Ohio Attorney General’s Office was called upon to ensure an independent and transparent inquiry.

However, in response to this request, Scott M. Tuma, Law Director and Chief Prosecutor for the City of Parma, stated that he had reviewed the available files, including the County Medical Examiner’s report and subsequent toxicology reports. He agreed with the previous decisions made by Parma Safety Director Brian Coury and former Law Director Tim Dobeck not to reopen the investigation. Tuma did indicate that he would be open to reviewing any new evidence that may emerge.

While this response is disappointing, it highlights the urgent need for public pressure and independent investigative efforts. The refusal to reopen the case, despite glaring inconsistencies and unresolved questions, suggests a reluctance to challenge official narratives or expose potential misconduct within the justice system.

Next Steps: Continuing the Fight for Truth

The Exposer remains committed to shedding light on cases like these, ensuring that the truth is not buried under bureaucracy and corruption. We will continue investigating the circumstances surrounding Dawn Pasela’s death, advocating for a thorough and impartial review of the evidence.

If you have any information regarding this case or wish to support efforts to demand justice, reach out and join the fight. The truth must prevail, and accountability must be enforced.

Stay informed. Stay vigilant. Demand accountability.